top of page
ChatGPT Image Jan 13, 2026 at 05_04_07 PM.png
Editorial Standards and Compliance

Approved Opinions™

Approved Opinions maintains rigorous editorial standards to ensure all published content meets the expectations of modern political discourse and remains consistent with officially sanctioned thinking.

Our commitment to compliance is unwavering.

Standards of Acceptable Thought
All manuscripts, essays, and publications are evaluated according to the following criteria:

  • Alignment with prevailing moral consensus

  • Adherence to approved terminology and framing

  • Proper recognition of designated heroes, victims, and villains

  • Absence of unauthorized nuance

  • Respect for the emotional safety of approved audiences

Submissions exhibiting excessive skepticism, unsanctioned humor, or independent reasoning may be returned for revision, correction, or quiet removal.

Ideological Review Process
Each publication undergoes a thorough internal review to determine whether its conclusions are:

  • Approved — Fully compliant with accepted narratives

  • Provisionally Approved — Satirical, but pointing in the correct direction

  • Reluctantly Approved — Ideologically questionable but rhetorically useful

  • Historically Approved — Once acceptable, now regrettable

  • Under Review — Pending reassessment based on current events

Approval status is subject to change without notice.

Balance & Fairness Policy

Approved Opinions does not pursue balance, neutrality, or objectivity.

Instead, we strive for narrative consistency.

While many of our publications critique progressive orthodoxy and cultural absurdities, others acknowledge or defend conservative ideas that have received temporary or conditional approval. This does not imply endorsement of independent thought.

Fairness is determined internally.

Corrections & Revisions

If an opinion is later deemed incorrect, harmful, or insufficiently aligned with updated guidance:

  • The content may be revised

  • Context may be added

  • Language may be softened

  • Conclusions may be reversed

  • Or the opinion may be declared “never held”

Past positions should not be cited as evidence of inconsistency.

Reader Compliance

Readers are encouraged to:

  • Consume content responsibly

  • Avoid drawing unauthorized conclusions

  • Update beliefs as instructed

  • Report unapproved interpretations

Repeated failure to comply may result in confusion, frustration, or unintended clarity.

Final Notice

Approved Opinions reserves the right to determine what constitutes acceptable discourse, correct thinking, and permissible humor.

Independent thought is not prohibited.
It simply requires approval.

bottom of page